Say what you will.
Moderators: james , DannyBee , tom p
james
Site Admin
Posts: 2934 Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 12:21 pm
Location: Norwich, UK
Contact:
Post
by james » Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:28 pm
bbc wrote: Experts have invented a mannequin with a motorised mouth to test the amount of crumbs biscuits produce.
Staff at the Mcvitie's laboratory in High Wycombe, Bucks, designed the Crumb Test Dummy to test which baking techniques produce the most crumbs....
I like how the mannequin appears to be scared of the feeder man, his hair net and the biscuit.
..."The Crumb Test Dummy has a never-ending appetite and doesn't need to stop for breath."
I thought that's where fat people came in.
Full story
Whatever next?
lew
Graf Kingpin
Posts: 370 Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 4:18 pm
Location: narch (norwich)
Post
by lew » Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:08 pm
what a brilliant way to spend money, thank god that people are testing things like this. where would we be without them!!
setwin
Posts: 352 Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:19 pm
Location: cambridge
Contact:
Post
by setwin » Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:39 pm
why does the dummy need a hair net???
lew
Graf Kingpin
Posts: 370 Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 4:18 pm
Location: narch (norwich)
Post
by lew » Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:53 pm
hmm an interestiing point, what do you think his favourite biscuits are?
Mine are bournville ..
but maybe custard creams ACTUALLY I DONT KNOW aaaaarg
setwin
Posts: 352 Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:19 pm
Location: cambridge
Contact:
Post
by setwin » Sun Mar 13, 2005 7:33 pm
looks circular to me. rich tea???
Chalet Ed
Posts: 118 Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 11:44 am
Location: Norwich
Contact:
Post
by Chalet Ed » Sun Mar 13, 2005 7:42 pm
i detect a hint of oats....maybe a hobnob? The king of biscuits i may add.
setwin
Posts: 352 Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:19 pm
Location: cambridge
Contact:
Post
by setwin » Sun Mar 13, 2005 10:56 pm
i have to disagree on the hobnob front. as sad as it is to have a diagrement about biscuits i reckon chocolate digestives [although may seem boring at first] as far superior to hobnobs. also hobnob is just a shit name too
Hénrí
Resident Dee-e-Jay
Posts: 725 Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 7:52 pm
Location: New York
Contact:
Post
by Hénrí » Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:24 am
Man, its all about the party rings!
MikeTheBarber
Graf Kingpin
Posts: 612 Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 2:27 pm
Post
by MikeTheBarber » Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:47 am
I'd say that looks like a digestive, and chocolate digestives are the shit!......especially the ones with the caramel in but too many of them makes my tummy feel sicky
ahrkboob
Posts: 323 Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:15 pm
Post
by ahrkboob » Mon Mar 14, 2005 2:16 am
HOB NOBS! DIGESTIVES! I hate to lower the tone, BUT you people dont know what the fuck you are talking about. A true biscuit expert knows its fig rolls and garabaldi all the way. SO FUCK YOU AND THE CRUMBS YOU SIT IN!!!!!!!!!!
you will fry!
Jonny Megabyte
Posts: 376 Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:14 pm
Location: EN HQ: Palmsprings
Contact:
Post
by Jonny Megabyte » Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:22 pm
I don't know if it's classed as a biscuit, but
I personally think an Orange Viscount is the fucking daddy!
lew
Graf Kingpin
Posts: 370 Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 4:18 pm
Location: narch (norwich)
Post
by lew » Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:53 pm
i would have to disagree, i think that fig rolls are one of the most disgusting bits of food ever to be made.
What are they!?!?!?!
WRONG
chocolate digestives with caramel are damn good sam. damn good!
Chalet Ed
Posts: 118 Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 11:44 am
Location: Norwich
Contact:
Post
by Chalet Ed » Mon Mar 14, 2005 9:05 pm
I agree, fig rolls belong in hell.....along with their sick and twisted inventor. I mean figs are pretty evil by themselves but to put them in a roll is surely the workings of a madman.
tough one about viscounts, they are lush but i don't reckon they belong to the biscuit family of snacks. Personally i would disqualify them from any type of biscuit comp. Sorry Johnny.